From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 6 01:51:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C792F16A673 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0713043D48 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:18:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k561rD9a048726; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:53:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id k561rDKb048725; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:53:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:53:13 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: "Max N. Boyarov" Message-ID: <20060606015312.GA48678@ci0.org> References: <7hirngmc3j.fsf@bsd.by> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7hirngmc3j.fsf@bsd.by> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ep80219 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:51:17 -0000 On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:59:44AM +0300, Max N. Boyarov wrote: > > Hi, Olivier > > Patch for ep80219 can be downloaded from http://ncd0.bsd.by/arm/ep80219.diff.gz > and small fix for VERBOSE_INIT_ARM http://ncd0.bsd.by/arm/verbose_init_arm.diff.gz > > Thanks a lot for this ! I've already committed the VERBOSE_INIT_ARM fix. Reading the EP80219 diffs, it seems a lot of the code is very similar to the i80321 one. Do you think it would be doable to merge them, and only have ep80219_machdep.c in the i80219, with the EP80219-specific reg file, or would it end up being a #ifdef nightmare ? Olivier