From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 5 23:35:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8316A420 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:35:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F52043D45 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id u2so484611uge for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:35:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=iN1WOsEPGuK9a+kcoiHnzLYOpZNhSAKmnfYNuAxJUNZAnWFndr6CP8fPWdibzgHn42PIaVPV7fyr8te3rtMjgIdNK6Y5GzrvVhPo6uTJ86t3A54Y/DaEe/g1S5WJpmRNGRRkKIsdzdvnsi2cUj8cD2d+a0W15DySasOeeXTq5tE= Received: by 10.49.34.11 with SMTP id m11mr1056346nfj; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.11 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:35:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:35:13 -0500 From: Xn Nooby To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <17382.15078.954911.389581@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200602042201.00168.duncan.fbsd@gmail.com> <17382.15078.954911.389581@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does portsdb -Uu run so long? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 23:35:17 -0000 On 2/5/06, Robert Huff wrote: > > > Xn Nooby writes: > > > Everyone that knows what they are doing never seem to have a problem. > > Respectfully, rubbish. > I use portupgrade; where it seems applicable I am careful to > mention one ought to read the manual completely, and to state my > experiences where it has clearly and without provocation Done the > Wrong Thing. Similar behavior can be observed in other posters, > with a statistical bias toward the more technically experienced. > (Your mileage may vary.) Okay.