Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:23:04 -0500 From: Rusty Nejdl <rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com> To: Raynaud Alexandre <alexandre.raynaud@sallanches.fr> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ASSP current stable Message-ID: <assp.0820eb03f9.63cb4c0e8d0e6baca257c847d7414c5c@ringofsaturn.com> In-Reply-To: <BD786772F903534781150FCAB4A79A5C016F0A7C@pe2850-exch.ville-sallanches.adm> References: <BD786772F903534781150FCAB4A79A5C016F0A7C@pe2850-exch.ville-sallanches.adm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=20 Raynaud,=20 We've been in a ports lock down for a while but even so, it doesn't pay to upgrade this port too often because there are often bugs in releases that are fixed and a new tarball rolled with the same version. The current version is from March 3rd so we're not that out of date. We're out of lock down now so I will look at another release sometime soon.=20 That being said, are you concerned about a bug or feature that the 1.99 version offers that the 1.98 doesn't?=20 Rusty Nejdl=20 On 2013-04-18 12:24, Raynaud Alexandre wrote:=20 > Hi, as mentioned in ASSP 1.9x latest changelog, ASSP 1.98 any build are no longer maintained and the only stable version is build 1.99 (13098) :=20 > > _ASSP changelog assp.pl 1.99 (13106)_=20 >=20 > _ _=20 >=20 > _-There is no developer version 1.98 any longer._=20 >=20 > _-There is only a stable version starting with build 1.99 (13098)._=20 >=20 > _ _=20 >=20 > Are there any plans to upgrade FreeBSD ASSP port?=20 >=20 > Thanks=20 >=20 > Regards,=20 >=20 > MAIRIE DE SALLANCHES=20 >=20 > DIRECTION DES SYST=C3=88MES D'INFORMATION=20 >=20 > ALEXANDRE RAYNAUD=20 >=20 > email: alexandre.raynaud@sallanches.fr =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 18 20:55:49 2013 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C257D6 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB796A for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id tp5so1441064ieb.40 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:55:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Ep6CJ1NeQfSGgOREvGWFw7vEsRDXr/WOVBlwY15mY2E=; b=MreNjZknRtSMyv46ZSRknBbMrhxHodLQhXfeuChGkLKjMb3NLIsq0cDwZD1UoR4RdT DwoZNR7ukvsmu6AVjH5Z/uaIQuYDX82GxpPaGJq2QwpObQi95wNFIQHhpXiGYK9guF76 6td7zBgMEk1PrNOxc9QQ4VupuiozKi2NY7C/TJxTHt/jd+ynHi5L2XM21BIMMGhdXLQl wBkO+DaiUWIaCbcdWyUS2mif7ud8BUtKeMn+O5Dcb70Wq3ypGgxv4VZtxECa+1dfNxat 2oxl86ISPLYotVxCeiH8pQj8FKhKIOM0DumL18GhzmmTTlclzaHm2sw7GOn/cndr8GsJ HsjQ== X-Received: by 10.50.47.10 with SMTP id z10mr466341igm.15.1366318548546; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:55:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.58.52 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:55:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:55:18 +0100 Message-ID: <CADLo838E+bFg3xsVu4Z+14wac_pmMxrjTgHgBHrz2UwLiquEmQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: LC_MESSAGES plist generation To: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:55:49 -0000 HI all, It drives me absolutely nuts keeping track of which .mo files get installed to %D/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES, and they seem to have new ones added all the time. This means that what should be a simple version bump turns into chasing up gettext directories etc; have a look at [1] for the fun I have most times I update transmission. How do people feel about simply automatically generating the plist entries? This patch simply replaces all the %%NLS%% lines in the plist with a single LC_MESSAGES=${mo_name}; for example the Transmission port would use LC_MESSAGES=transmission-gtk. The patch shows how accessibility/atk and gettext would be modified, and there's a buildlog at [2] for atk, with obvious rough edges (coupla empty directories left behind, obviously we can fix that with hier cookies in gettext). http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/lc-messages-patch.diff Who else wants to chop out loads of useless plist lines? :) Chris [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net-p2p/transmission-gtk/pkg-plist [2] http://www.bayofrum.net/tb/index.php?action=display_markup_log&build=7.4-local&id=2388
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?assp.0820eb03f9.63cb4c0e8d0e6baca257c847d7414c5c>