From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Jan 11 16:25:18 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA25838 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:25:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25820 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:25:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA86533 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:29:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:29:35 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fatal Trap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Greg Rowe wrote: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid=1; lapic.id = 01000000(I've also seen it for cpuid0) > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf0216357 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xff618ce8 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xff618d0c > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 243 (tar) > interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <-SMP:XXX why is this XXX? is it just an indication that using spl() is a bad thing for SMP and that movement away from the spl() model of interupt servicing is a good thing? -Alfred > kernel: type 12 trap, code 0 > Stopped at generic_bzero+0xf: repe stosl %es:(%edi) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message