From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Apr 22 04:03:02 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D312C508B; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496Rc61MMxz4dpX; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 0D024DF7A; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:03:01 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: Craig Leres , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r532040 - head/cad/opencascade Message-ID: <20200422040301.GA49215@FreeBSD.org> References: <202004181842.03IIgSxm046815@repo.freebsd.org> <20200419180216.GA35570@elch.exwg.net> <20200419182522.GB35570@elch.exwg.net> <20200420141511.GX50322@graf.pompo.net> <20200421213727.GA2866@elch.exwg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200421213727.GA2866@elch.exwg.net> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:03:02 -0000 On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:37:27PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Thierry Thomas (thierry@freebsd.org): > ... > > This port produces various strange things: the first (known) problem is > > that you have to deinstall it before trying to `make', because if it > > is already installed it uses binaries from the previous version. But of > > course a poudriere build is not affected by this one. > > You put "why we have poudriere" into quite a lot of words :) While poudriere and tinderbox often mask the bugs like this, it's still a bug and should be fixed. ./danfe