From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 01:36:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AD216A4CE; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 01:36:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28CB43D39; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 01:36:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 957AB148F4; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:36:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:36:10 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <20041202132637.2e47744b@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Merging the FAQ -> handbook, build time options, proof ofconcept patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 01:36:11 -0000 One other thing I need to say although, again, I'm short-cycled tonight, and it's one of the things I have meant to try to do. Each of the Answers really ought to have a Last-Modified stamp on it (MM/YYYY is good enough). This would give users an idea of whether or not the answer might or might not apply to modern versions of FreeBSD or is just a bit of text from the Stone Age. If we wait to put those on until all the questions are up-to-date, well, it'll never happen. Even a placeholder "before 10/2004" would give us something better than what we've got. (My other idea is that the Project pages really, really, need this as well, for the same reason.) mcl