From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 4 08:28:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA25182 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 08:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from darkstar (dialin2.anlw.anl.gov [141.221.252.102]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA25163 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 08:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cmott@localhost) by darkstar (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA08728; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:28:09 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:28:08 -0700 (MST) From: Charles Mott X-Sender: cmott@darkstar To: Brian Somers cc: Julian Elischer , Eivind Eklund , Brian Somers , Ari Suutari , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single socket version of natd In-Reply-To: <199702041133.LAA23749@ui-gate.utell.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The one situation I think is difficult for natd to handle is is when ppp is running in -auto mode, and it reconnects on each dial-in with a different dynamcially assigned address. At the moment, natd can do device address lookup at startup, but to handle the above mentioned case, it would have to do a device address lookup for every packet. Is it possible to do this? I personally like having both ppp -alias as well as natd. Having the software embedded in ppp and enabled with the -alias switch makes life very easy for a great number of less sophisticated users. Charles Mott On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > You guessed it - Charles originally wrote the code so. Eventually, I'd > like to > remove the -alias switch from ppp and have the only implementation being > in the natd code. > > Brian > > Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour > > ---------- > > From: Julian Elischer > > To: Eivind Eklund > > Cc: Charles Mott ; Brian Somers > ; Ari Suutari ; > hackers@freebsd.org; brian@utell.co.uk > > Subject: Re: Single socket version of natd > > Date: 04 February 1997 10:49 > > > > Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > > > > At 07:36 PM 2/3/97 -0700, Charles Mott wrote: > > > >Eivind has these updates and has integrated them into his codebase, > > > >which he is continuing to work on. He writes that he has changed some > of > > > >the compile options (ALIAS_ALLOW_INCOMING, ALIAS_SAME_PORTS, etc.) to > ppp > > > >commands. > > > > > So are we talking about ppp, or natd here? > > teh subject line says natd.. > > but sounds like that's not the case... > > (or has someone abstracted out the alias code to > > a separate module that can be used for both? > > > > julian >