Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 13:05:55 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: obraun@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile Message-ID: <20020831200555.GC90613@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <04e601c25127$1b88cdc0$f800a8c0@dwcjr> References: <200204261840.g3QIeEJ84330@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020827234337.GA79648@dragon.nuxi.com> <04d801c25122$4527a840$f800a8c0@dwcjr> <20020831193211.GA22902@dragon.nuxi.com> <04e601c25127$1b88cdc0$f800a8c0@dwcjr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:46:32PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > So what do you recommend when rsync does not continue to include its own > > > popt? > > > > Why do you think that will happen? It still supplies its own libz. > > Because that's what the whole dispute was over in the thread about this. I I don't see how the rsync author can do what he treatens (as shown by the other included bits). But why not wait until that happens to use the ports version? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020831200555.GC90613>