From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 8 07:49:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E73B601; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 07:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423732FAD; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 07:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VIZm7-000BEj-Cy; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:51:15 +0400 Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:51:15 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: svn commit: r255323 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf Message-ID: <20130908075115.GA41751@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20130907081743.GB95723@zxy.spb.ru> <20130907170700.GB3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130907210244.GE3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130907212957.GF3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130908071912.GY4574@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130908071912.GY4574@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Adrian Chadd , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , Bryan Venteicher , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "Andrey V. Elsukov" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , Edward Tomasz Napiera?a X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 07:49:18 -0000 On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 11:19:12AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 01:29:57AM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > S> I think now -HEAD can't be more risky by one or two patches. > > Yes, it can. > > Do you run HEAD actually on regular basis when you make such > an assertion? I am use -HEAD on my notebook. And I run -HEAD with iSCSI patches in production.