From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 14:17:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B1816A4BF for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9CE43FE0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 14:17:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9]) by mail.imp.ch (8.12.9p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h93LHgmw087983; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:17:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:17:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Blapp To: Eric van Gyzen In-Reply-To: <200310031247.31282.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> Message-ID: <20031003231708.O64425@cvs.imp.ch> References: <200310031247.31282.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is /proc still necessary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 21:17:50 -0000 Hi, > Does OOo 1.1.0 require the /proc filesystem? I seem to remember that > the 1.0.x setup required it. Only 1.01 and 1.02 did require it. 1.03 and 1.1 don't need it anymore. Martin