From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 2 13: 5:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74C837B66C for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e92K5sI04081; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA14341; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:05:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010022005.OAA14341@harmony.village.org> To: Michael Lucas Subject: Re: No UPDATING for RELENG_3? Cc: Alexander Frolkin , Ken Bolingbroke , cjclark@alum.mit.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:21:46 EDT." <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> <20000930224049.H25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001002201356.A1228@gamma> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 14:05:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001002152146.A63025@blackhelicopters.org> Michael Lucas writes: : Then we'd have accusations of bloat, however, and far more bandwidth : would be wasted discussing the merits of the idea than would be caused : by implementing it. Never mind, forget I said anything at all. And said discussion wuold likely be cut sure by a working implementation :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message