From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jun 19 11:03:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA06475
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA06466;
          Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA24858; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:19:59 MDT."
             <199606191719.LAA06390@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:00:49 -0700
Message-ID: <24855.835207249@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> See above.  It's a worthwhile difficulty, in the same manner as
> re-writing the VM system was worthwhile and adding laptop capability was
> worthwhile.  The time spent isn't always fun, but the resultant product
> is.

I think that "worthwhile difficulty" is not the argument we should be
having here since it's more a question of "necessary difficulty."  Arguing
worth is a straw man.

					Jordan