From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 19:05:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FA116A4D7; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:05:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6346143D3F; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7KJ5Ob0024161; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:05:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7KJ5Oqq024160; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:05:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:05:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200408201905.i7KJ5Oqq024160@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: green@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040820185652.GD1019@green.homeunix.org> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kqueued make(1): can someone try it for me please? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:05:25 -0000 >Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:56:52 -0400 >From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman >To: Ruslan Ermilov >Cc: David Wolfskill , current@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: kqueued make(1): can someone try it for me please? >Since when does make -jX buildworld work? I've tried it for months >and had it keep breaking in the same place. Well, I reported it working (running yesterday's RELENG_5) this morning. And in doing the tests that ru@ requested, I ran it twice more, running RELENG_5 that I built this morning. Each of these was "make -j8 buildworld" on an SMP box. Indeed, the only problem I can attribute to -jX within the last few weeks has been an annoying lockup. Not specifying -jX has circumvented the problem for me each time, so far. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Evidence of curmudgeonliness: becoming irritated with the usage of the word "speed" in contexts referring to quantification of network performance, as opposed to "bandwidth" or "latency."