Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Jul 2001 14:48:40 +0200
From:      Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To:        Dirk Froemberg <dirk@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, bsdx@looksharp.net, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: latest gcombust incompatible with our mkisofs/cdrecord
Message-ID:  <20010729144840.A41314@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20010729144009.A41203@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>; from dirk@freebsd.org on Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:40:10PM %2B0200
References:  <20010724211447.A42830@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <200107242102.f6OL2GY97977@aldan.algebra.com> <20010729144009.A41203@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:40:10PM +0200, Dirk Froemberg wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Ok, I finished a port for cdrtools. You can look at it at
> http://www.physik.tu-berlin.de/~ibex/ports/cdrtools.tar.gz
> 
> I'm sending a Cc to ports to see if there are any objections
> to removing mkisofs (which is part of cdrtools)...

Well... I don't need anything else apart from mkisofs for my IDE
burner, so a separate port would be nice... Not required of course,
but I think it will cause confusion if people with IDE drives
have a 'cdrecord' binary that they can't use.

Maybe a slave port for mkisofs only?

--Stijn

> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:02:13PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On 24 Jul, Dirk Froemberg wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > An upgrade to cdtools-1.10 is already on my TODO list. Perhaps
> > > I can find time at the weekend...
> > 
> > Remember to remove the mkisofs to avoid future confusion. Thanks!
> > 
> > 	-mi
> >  
> > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:04:25PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > >> The latest gcombust (available from ports) warns at start-up, that it
> > >> will only work with the mkisofs, that comes with the latest cdrecord
> > >> (renamed to cdrtools-1.10). The mkisofs itself is no longer available
> > >> separately...
> 
> -- 
> Dirk Froemberg
> 
> FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!		http://www.FreeBSD.org/
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message

-- 
What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010729144840.A41314>