From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 21:31:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB7B106564A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F57F8FC0A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so7327635iak.13 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gL1k/j55jy6fyISae7/hZ61g8/ViSkkLRs5QfgTkJQM=; b=H1eG7A23kqdCBJZRzfAoF1Mv5npCDjvRDeL2rdnY+xDAGXCWB8yyHtggcJo4GufCGz buLwf7h3HvSc0Z5gHn76bej0Oa+66UeV/NCgGGLmcUP/D7MeHzHTqbrzyaBL7D7iFVVC G5fd2L1Nd/C6tRZstUNaohdmTZmUstcn+BzKk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.67.211 with SMTP id s19mr5111234ibi.91.1321219901761; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:41 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." , Dmitry Marakasov , Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:43 -0000 On 13 Nov 2011 21:20, "Doug Barton" wrote: > > On 11/13/2011 12:25, Mikhail T. wrote: > > You've gone from "small minority of other interested parties" to "no one > > has made a peep" in a single e-mail! If this is the quality of the rest > > of your reasoning, than you should not be surprised, that it has not > > really resonated despite the "endless repetition"... > > You turned a comparison of the discussion of the concept of ports > removal generally to the removal of individual ports and turned it into > an ad hominem attack on the quality of *my* reasoning. This is an > excellent example of why I, for one, don't bother replying substantively > to your messages anymore. > > > Doug Oh my.... it's two months ago. Is it? Can we move on? Ports are deprecated and removed. Insecure/unmaintained ports are harmful. If you care, step up to maintain them. Seriously. Or stop complaining. Chris PS only replying to Doug because it's the latest email, not because I think he disagrees with me.