Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:55:11 -0500
From:      Akenner <SlackWareWolf@comcast.net>
To:        FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Steps to upgrade from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE]]
Message-ID:  <49849E8F.6050300@comcast.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050807060108060909000105
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

*snipped*

OK, so right now I've been reading this, and I had a look at the 
configuration file for FreeBSD-update, and it seems I could use that to 
test it out since I haven't really used it before, by basically running 
it with -r RELEASE and it would upgrade everything to that?

also being from the Linux world, I'm having a slight bit of trouble 
understanding one part, which is what "upgrades" mean in BSD VS Linux.

For example, on my Slackware boxes, I can do this to update / upgrade 
when a security problem is found and patched:

upgradepkg name-of-package-slack12.tgz and it upgrades it.

On here they have a different meaning though I THINK... I'm not positive 
yet if I'm understanding this right, or if I've gotten confused.

I'm not giving up because I'm really enjoying how FreeBSD works, and 
always have loved it, and this time I've decided to take the time to 
learn how to run it properly, which is why the last two weeks, I've 
spent most of my time using it, asking questions on here, and reading my 
library of books on BSD, and reading the BSD web site in the handbook 
area so to not ask questions I can find easy.

So, am I confusing these terms with how they work? Or..?

Really I just want to make sure I have the security patches installed by 
running something I could maybe add to cron later, or make a very simple 
perl script, but if that isn't the best solution, at least I'd like to 
have security patches installed and have my machine up to date as much 
as possible with fixes.

So, for making sure my machine is updated with the latest security 
patches and bug fixes, would CVS maybe be better, or FreeBSD-update? Or 
both?

Also if I'm not getting annoying yet, which I may very well be heh, when 
it asks for RELEASE in FreeBSD-update,  I know that STABLE is the stable 
and trusted one, and RELEASE is the latest one but is tested enough to 
be used, and then the bleeding edge one you shouldn't use.... Which 
would one pick who wanted to keep updated to do this with and not be 
totally insane?

Thanks all, and apologies on length / number of questions. I'm just 
tryign to understand how it works so I can take some notes and remember 
for myself how it works without breaking it/

--------------050807060108060909000105
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
	name="Re: [Fwd: Re: Steps to upgrade from 7.0-RELEASE to
	7.1-RELEASE].eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename*0="Re: [Fwd: Re: Steps to upgrade from 7.0-RELEASE to
	7.1-RELEA"; filename*1="SE].eml"

X-Account-Key: account2
X-Mozilla-Keys: 
Return-Path: sonic2000gr@gmail.com
Received: from imta27.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (LHLO
	IMTA27.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.95) by
	sz0066.ev.mail.comcast.net with LMTP;
	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f19.google.com ([209.85.219.19])
	by IMTA27.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id 9kzc1b00q0RiKHd0Tl08UQ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:00:08 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=0eZeRF5pshkA:10 a=QQuHglDxTDkA:10
	a=fOlWelpuo88OU0MHtxlzVg==:17 a=P8ZiBXKA7dsXfE95tL4A:9
	a=HW_CxcnpDNAZydcO3GlGyZqeoo4A:4 a=WU_sd0P_5lsA:10
Received: by mail-ew0-f19.google.com with SMTP id 12so522007ewy.5
	for <SlackWareWolf@comcast.net>; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
	:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=8PXgZ0xyjWV8b1PzjaeIC6SSCEsVBCGrsVpqz9uNIyw=;
	b=snT0cT4dC1xOxXO+WpbEf2CLR7C612l4y4xSVZ7R1HauJZcZzpeJx14Wu7LNuqYe18
	/ESG4BFXkx9bOkp7FTARQjeZkI9J5VQOGEttshilaD9q5uKkJcOGFtbB7D02f3eCow4Y
	L7+piXkl7sJGIkCS+Y1M1dUZirz1srz8NcqQo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=YLwtmffKwV4Xj5cckUJxYa6+WPYd+YHVljwsUxdwlam5jeWs/bKcOBJuLSO4l8MAOt
	TpY2vwrp9kChaCZAZoWmjlbSOs8eVLO5syH2woyDvLMpzD+h/niP+bf1dkaAki/tLNRx
	7CpayiYFKblzzYj4S25edm65WgOzodeEv/nSg=
Received: by 10.210.76.4 with SMTP id y4mr1094098eba.125.1233306006860;
	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <sonic2000gr@gmail.com>
Received: from joshua.freebsdgr.org (athedsl-4557718.home.otenet.gr
	[94.70.87.158])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h1sm2091391nfh.63.2009.01.30.01.00.05
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4982C194.1060300@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:00:04 +0200
From: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090104)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Akenner <SlackWareWolf@comcast.net>
CC: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Steps to upgrade from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE]
References: <4982BA04.9020102@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <4982BA04.9020102@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Akenner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've continued reading to keep myself updated with info used, and I 
> have a few questions about what I've seen about freebsd-update:
>
> I've read not to use FreeBSD-update AND cvsup together, and so I've 
> decided to go along with this as to not cause problems for myself.
>
> Does FreeBSD-update have any benefit over the cvsup method? I've heard 
> you don't have to go single user and a few other things, but does it 
> have any actual benefit?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Allen

You don't have to recompile  anything (can be lengthy esp. on older 
machines), the mergemaster step is usually a lot simpler and less 
tedious. Very useful for people tracking RELEASE and the security 
branch. You still need csup / cvsup to track STABLE or CURRENT though.


--------------050807060108060909000105--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49849E8F.6050300>