From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 8 5:49:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from meta.lo-res.org (meta.lo-res.org [195.58.189.92]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D977737B401 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 05:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chillig.lo-res.org ([62.116.8.4]) by meta.lo-res.org (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g48CngiC018496; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:49:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from aaron@lo-res.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: aaron To: Terry Lambert Subject: Re: /usr/include/netinet/in.h Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:49:12 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205071814.46995.aaron@lo-res.org> <200205071937.20043.aaron@lo-res.org> <3CD8B8D3.F605B84B@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <3CD8B8D3.F605B84B@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200205081449.12733.aaron@lo-res.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 08 May 2002 07:34, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Thanks for answering. I was under the impression that lots of linux apps > > rely on promiscuous includes... so i expected them to be there in fbsd > > just as well.. (but my memory of linux programming times is a bit fainted > > already). > > Yes. They do. > Would smthg like "what are promicous includes and why you don't want them" be a topic for a developers (and or the ports-) handbook (at the right place)? greetings, aaron. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message