From owner-freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Thu Apr 14 05:59:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49AB10D49 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA01720 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 48C13B10D48; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dtrace@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463BBB10D47 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from mail-2.alumni.tu-berlin.de (mail-2.alumni.tu-berlin.de [130.149.5.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009B8171F for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de) X-tubIT-Incoming-IP: 92.225.0.44 Received: from x5ce1002c.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.225.0.44] helo=moto-e) by mailbox.alumni.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.76) with esmtpsa [UNKNOWN:AES256-SHA:256] for id 1aqZzJ-0005ls-QC; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:38:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <345E2021-EC9B-4040-AA5C-7879371F13F8@freebsd.org> References: <59138256-95CC-4E43-9672-8F3486D37B6C@freebsd.org> <20160414032829.GT31516@strugglingcoder.info> <345E2021-EC9B-4040-AA5C-7879371F13F8@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: replacement of cddl/contrib/opendtrace with the OpenDTrace version From: Florian Ermisch Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:38:42 +0200 To: dtrace@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-BeenThere: freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "A discussion list for developers working on DTrace in FreeBSD." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:59:40 -0000 Am 14. April 2016 05:49:03 MESZ, schrieb George Neville-Neil : > > > On 13 Apr 2016, at 20:28, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 04/13/16 at 07:38P, George Neville-Neil wrote: > >> Howdy, > >> > >> I've created a new project and organization on githhub for > maintaining > >> bits of DTrace, including the DTrace Toolkit. I have imported the > last > >> known version of the toolkit into this repo: > >> > >> https://github.com/opendtrace/toolkit > >> > >> I have then applied all the changes made by Rui Paolo, Ed Maste and > >> myself within a "freebsd" branch in that repo. > >> > >> Before 11.0 I intend to remove the toolkit from the FreeBSD repo > and > >> maintain it separately, along with scripts and versions for the > other > >> operating systems that support DTrace. I'd like folks to test this > >> replacement on FreeBSD. It should be as simple as: > >> > >> ?> rm /usr/src/cddl/contrib/dtracetoolkit > >> ?> git clone https://github.com/opendtrace/toolkit.git > >> ?> git checkout -b freebsd > >> > >> I've tested this locally on my systems but I'd like to hear > feedback > >> from others before I pull the scripts from our tree. > > > > Hi George, > > > > What is the rationale of treating this specially and not like any > other > > contrib software? IIRC, a few things from toolkit gets installed in > > /usr/share/dtrace/toolkit currently which is pretty handy at times. > I > > was hoping we install more things but it looks like now we'd have to > go > > get it from a git repo. > > > > It's getting very little (to no) attention in our tree, and I'm now > working on a combined set of scripts that are cross platform. > > Best, > George Hi George, so there will be a port/pkg "dtrace-toolkit" later? Or will an updated version pulled back into head? Generally I think it's a good idea to have an upstream outside FreeBSD's tree. Hopefully it will encourage contributions from other platforms as well. Regards, Florian