From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 8 7:35:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C51437B4FE; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 07:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id eA8FWUV87045; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:32:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:32:30 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Max Khon Cc: "Koster, K.J." , "'Doug Barton'" , "'FreeBSD Hackers mailing list'" Subject: Re: daemon() Message-ID: <20001108163230.Q80971@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D79C7@l04.research.kpn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 05:06:42PM +0600 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001108 12:10], Max Khon (fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) wrote: [snip spurious fd problem] >as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it. >my question was about unclosed pipe Which seems to me, after X people tested the same program under a host of different shells, including bash 2.x, that the problem lies with bash 1.x. And people _did_ answer the question by pointing that out. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Things do not change, we change... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message