From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Nov 14 13:00:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C134DBE3EE for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.home.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24087D80E for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vAED0eGB057086; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:00:40 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: Updating Instructions To: Baho Utot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <34bd4349-0215-5341-3f32-b8d21afbde99@columbus.rr.com> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:00:40 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34bd4349-0215-5341-3f32-b8d21afbde99@columbus.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:00:53 -0000 On 14/11/2017 12:47, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 11/14/17 03:29, Carmel NY wrote: >> Out of morbid curiosity, I was just wondering why instructions for >> updating a >> moved or discontinued port are never posted for "synth", like they are >> for >> "portupgrade" or "portmaster" in the UPDATING file? An example would >> be the >> recent 20171112 change in the devel/oniguruma* port. >> > > > I think it is because synth is a bads word around here More likely that very few of us knew about it. This thread was the first time I heard of it. I've been using poudriere since shortly after it came out, and it works fine for me. -- An amusing coincidence: log2(58) = 5.858 (to 0.0003% accuracy).