From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 17:10:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2E2466; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D62212F31; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aurora.physics.berkeley.edu (aurora.Physics.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.117.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6AGx96I019527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:59:10 -0700 Message-ID: <53BEC65D.10501@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:59:09 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Schouten , Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r268491 - head/usr.bin/users References: <201407101215.s6ACF3v1055260@svn.freebsd.org> <20140710152353.GF1812@ptrcrt.ch> <20140710154213.GG1812@ptrcrt.ch> <20140710155342.GB93051@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-ID: C;LsKHglMI5BGC102zUc16mQ== M;uJ+sglMI5BGC102zUc16mQ== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:10:14 -0000 On 07/10/14 08:57, Ed Schouten wrote: > On 10 July 2014 17:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Just make sure not to break mips, powerpc and sparc64 which are still using >> gcc 4.2 :) > Oomf! Good point. Completely forgot about that. There is indeed one > C++11-ism in the code, namely the use of auto. Let me fix that. > Some ARM platforms (armeb, for example) also use GCC. -Nathan