Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 23:20:47 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Felix-Antoine Paradis <reel@idemnia.ath.cx>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: PPPoE Message-ID: <200101222320.f0MNKl104853@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> of "Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:52:28 PST." <3A6C654C.F14FA457@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think the best way to implement this is some sort of config message =
to the pppoe node (before the connect/listen). The NETGRAPH version =
of ppp(8) is capable of doing ``chat scripts'' with netgraph nodes, =
so it's fairly easy to configure the node configuration conversation...
Hopefully now that Christmas is over I'll be able to get back to =
netgraph'ifying ppp :-)
> Felix-Antoine Paradis wrote:
> > =
> > To get pppoe to work, just set the options in the kernel and use a go=
od
> > config (ppp.conf) and use pppd.
> > =
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > =
> > > It seems I need the following parameters to get my PPPoE to work. C=
ould
> > > we have these options, please?
> > >
> > > >> -f disc:sess
> > > >> The -f option sets the Ethernet frame types for
> > > >> PPPoE discovery and session frames. The types are
> > > >> specified as hexadecimal numbers separated by a
> > > >> colon. Standard PPPoE uses frame types 8863:8864.
> > > >> You should not use this option unless you are abso=A1
> > > >> lutely sure the peer you are dealing with uses non-
> > > >> standard frame types. If your ISP uses non-stan=A1
> > > >> dard frame types, complain!
> =
> Definitly complain! This is equivalent to calling a protocol tcp/ip
> but using a first byte in the packet.
> I will look at a configuration message for the netgraph node
> but Brian will hav eto work out how to send it, and where the
> configuration parameter should be set to do this..
> =
> The other possibility is a sysctl.
> =
> =
> > > >> -S service_name
> > > >> Specifies the desired service name. pppoe will
> > > >> only initiate sessions with access concentrators
> > > >> which can provide the specified service. In most
> > > >> cases, you should not specify this option. Use it
> > > >> only if you know that there are multiple access
> > > >> concentrators or know that you need a specific ser=A1
> > > >> vice name.
> =
> =
> If you are talking about the netgraph based pppoe, then -xxx type =
> flags are not how you configure it. I think you are talking about
> the (rather inefficient) userland ppp daemon.
> =
> the service name requested is already an argument in the pppoe =
> configuration.
> =
> "If a PPPoE:iface[:provider] specification is given, ppp will at-
> tempt to create a PPP over Ethernet connection using the given
> iface interface by using netgraph(4). "
> =
> In this case the "provider" is the service name.
> =
> =
> -- =
> __--_|\ Julian Elischer
> / \ julian@elischer.org
> ( OZ ) World tour 2000
> ---> X_.---._/ from Perth, presently in: Budapest
> v
-- =
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org=
>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>; <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org=
>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101222320.f0MNKl104853>