From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 10:09:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4797316A702 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay2.beelinegprs.ru (relay2.beelinegprs.ru [217.118.71.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD2F43D48 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2 (Postfix) with SMTP id 36E4625490; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:14:42 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.23.27.139] (clusterfw.gprsrus.net [217.118.66.232]) by relay2.beelinegprs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5825463; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:14:37 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <448698F6.2050507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:14:30 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060429) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiawei Ye References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamtest-Info: License expired Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:09:31 -0000 Jiawei Ye wrote: > I *know* that there are limitations in the base tools or what to > expect. sysutil/portmanager can do this well enough (correct > dependancy), that's why I *wish* portupgrade could do this too. It's a > wishlist right? You're right, it's a wish list. But it does not touch portupgrade directly. portupgrade tools does not build own INDEX (does it portmanager?), It use a ready one. It's possible to implement, but it's not a purpose to grow the tools up. Moreover, building own INDEX is a long time process. I think nobody likes if it'll be rebuild every time you refresh the ports tree. -- Dixi. Sem.