From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 05:21:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1304616A421 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 05:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7A413C480 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 05:21:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so2626712wxd for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:21:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pM04zgDAVUKaTWoIGd/c/pRkSMV6ccP38gKnTl/DsMc=; b=ZZn0rHQx4TC6twr6Y466SaK0QL7fHl2FkxC0mMMlJGbHHgDAiWO5ibrzZTSHUYLP2FbkXlgs+5jvymaeCyE4xlM+hvP06bAXFnCIZWm/Q6QvvS/S2EdGser6CaYfElNnWkhmrpLvHwkFMD3X01BCscQAf4NNLzt4azW+d+sXBPk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ixpjJe3Bnoo/D0Eag/izlyXG2J6xfbfvRcfKXdo7qtX7jBloV8F6u14zenka056uxICi9e8tlYNE5nusXDsvU6r0My47g7vks717ViQ4bfBzLz71Mc3iARcteWWmJWJ37MlB7Fp+rmnaf9FJ04PWPGkcvyUhifsTq65z10ZSfkE= Received: by 10.90.89.5 with SMTP id m5mr2069287agb.1191216108753; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.74.18 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72cf361e0709302221h1a272d0fgfccfe176ff9f67da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:21:48 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" To: Pollywog In-Reply-To: <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070930152732.02576438@mail.computinginnovations.com> <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:21:50 -0000 Mailscanner and postfix is perfect combination...no problems with the correct installation type. http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:configuration:mta:postfix:politics -- Martin On 9/30/07, Pollywog wrote: > > On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:28:23 Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 03:20 PM 9/30/2007, Joe in MPLS wrote: > > >I'm running 6.2-STABLE with postfix with cyrus-sasl, imap-uw & horde > for > > >mail. I'd like to stop depending on clients(Thunderbird & PDAs) for > > >primary spam control (especially because our PDAs don't do any). AV > > >scanning would be a plus too. > > > > > > ...jgm > > > > I use mailscanner with sendmail which uses spamassasin with clamav. All > > from the ports. > > I used Mailscanner at one time, but it is not recommended for use with > Postfix > because mail can be lost. It never happened to me, but it has happened to > others. I believe the Postfix website mentions these problems. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >