Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 03:57:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 278232] Jail IPv4 source address selection inside a jail not working Message-ID: <bug-278232-29815-aWfEJZazS7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-278232-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-278232-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D278232 Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamie@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org> --- # man 2 jail ... Jails have a set of core parameters, and modules can add their own j= ail parameters. The current set of available parameters, and their f= or- mats, can be retrieved via the security.jail.param sysctl MIB ent= ry. Notable parameters include those mentioned in the jail() descript= ion above, as well as jid and name, which identify the jail being crea= ted or modified. See jail(8) for more information on the core jail para= me- ters. Hi Jamie, I'm not quite understand that statement. I think those sysctl kno= bs can be retired, but why shall we retrieve the formats of parameters? Isn't = them for developers only? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-278232-29815-aWfEJZazS7>