From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 1 12:21:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA01668 for current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA01663 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP id UAA03499; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 20:09:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 20:13:33 +0100 X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <199705301253.OAA04727@sliphost37.uni-trier.de> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> <199705300624.IAA03466@sos.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 20:10:27 +0100 To: Richard Wackerbarth From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: ctm Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 19:23 +0100 31/5/97, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: >At 6:49 AM -0500 5/31/97, Bob Bishop wrote: >>>14 amicus-networks.Dallas.mci.net (204.70.147.70) 207 ms * 211 ms >>>15 10.1.1.3 (10.1.1.3) 230 ms 187 ms 187 ms >> >>Eeek! Noone should be advertising a route to 10.x.x.x (see RFC1918). Try >>shouting at mci.net > >Who says that they are advertising a route to 10.x.x.x? >The advertised route is to 208.2.87.x You're right, of course; ISC. However, I share Gary Palmer's misgivings about using private space in this way. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK