Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:43:17 +0100 From: eoghan <freebsd@redry.net> To: ahze@ahze.net Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree Message-ID: <445664D5.7070207@redry.net> In-Reply-To: <b2203fed0605011240k79162c5cya2a58b5695b4b034@mail.gmail.com> References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200604301614.30077.andy@athame.co.uk> <op.s8txypkm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <200604301950.27364.andy@athame.co.uk> <b2203fed0604301032t1798001dpa7c88c9616c52533@mail.gmail.com> <44562619.3090403@freebsd.org> <1146500428.844.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1146511713.3140.4.camel@localhost> <44566395.1070904@redry.net> <b2203fed0605011240k79162c5cya2a58b5695b4b034@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
michael johnson wrote: > > > On 5/1/06, *eoghan* <freebsd@redry.net <mailto:freebsd@redry.net>> wrote: > > Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > В пн, 01/05/2006 в 12:20 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke пишет: > >> On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 17:15 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >>> michael johnson schrieb: > >>> > >>>>> ahze@ seems to have fixed the note in UPDATING for it, > although I'm not > >>>>> sure it's enough. At least x11/kdelibs wants mDNSResponder, > and if > >>>>> avahi is already installed the dependencies will be recorded > >>>>> incorrectly. I've already informed kde@ > >>>> > >>>> We're working on a fix. Either we will disable mDNSResponder > in avahi > >>> Yes, please. > >>> > >>>> or hopefully kde@ will want to use avahi's mDNSResponder. > >>> This wouldn't help the people running into the CONFLICTS right > now (the > >>> dependencies are already registered in people's pkgdbs when > they do, > >>> changing the kdelibs port won't fix that). We can try to make > that work > >>> later. > >>> > >>> Also ... seriously, do you guys even check just what is > depending on the > >>> things you're setting CONFLICTS with? I really was not > expecting to see > >>> anybody pull a fam->gamin again so soon. > >> We tested this change as we do all GNOME development > versions. In the > >> past, GNOME/KDE conflicts were quickly brought to light by our > testers. > >> It seems that this time around, we did not have anyone trying > GNOME 2.14 > >> with KDE on the same machine. I was rather shocked myself to learn > >> about this and the xpdf/poppler conflict so late. > > > > Both problems was reported before here: > > > > From: > > Vladimir Grebenschikov > > <vova@fbsd.ru <mailto:vova@fbsd.ru>> > > Sender: > > vova@fbsd.ru <mailto:vova@fbsd.ru> > > To: > > Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net <mailto:mezz7@cox.net>> > > Cc: > > Tuc at T-B-O-H <ml@t-b-o-h.net <mailto:ml@t-b-o-h.net>>, > > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> > > Subject: > > Re: Suggested mod for > > gnome_upgradeXXX.sh > > Date: > > Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:50:23 +0300 > > > > > > В вс, 19/03/2006 в 11:36 -0600, Jeremy Messenger пишет: > >> We will be no longer need gnome_upgradeXXX.sh in the future version > > of > >> GNOME. Bless to the ltverhack that fix libtool bug. Upgrade > GNOME 2.12 > > to > >> 2.14 (still in MC) was a lot easier than any previous version, which > > it > >> can be done with portupgrade now. About four to five steps to do > it. > >> Here's what I did with GNOME 2.12 to 2.14: > >> > >> pkgdb -Ff (need for gst stuff) > >> portupgrade -f -o net/avahi howl-\* > >> portupgrade -a > >> portupgrade -f -o x11/gnome-screensaver xscreensaver-gnome-\* > >> > >> The steps might be change if there is any better. Like might be best > > to > >> follow UPDATING before do the portupgrade -a. > > > > First of all thanks for good work. > > > > Unfortunately, I've do this upgrade before above suggestion, so I was > > forced to find the solution with howl -> avahi by myself. > > > > Also there is one more conflict of this kind: > > evinice requires poppler, but poppler conflicts with already > installed > > xpdf: > > ===> Installing for poppler-0.5.1 > > > > ===> poppler-0.5.1 conflicts with installed package(s): > > xpdf-3.01_2 > > > > They install files into the same place. > > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/poppler. > > *** Error code 1 > > Regarding poppler... > Is this a requirement for a successful gnome 2.14 upgrade? Mine is > running at the moment, and this did fail... > > > if you want to use the full gnome desktop (evince), than yes. But you > can keep xpdf installed if you'd rather not have evince. > > Michael ok thanks So can i make deinstall xpdf after my portupgrade and make install for poppler? Should this suffice or will i need to run portupgrade again? Eoghan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?445664D5.7070207>