From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 18 10:15:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D423337B423; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3IHFRU40679; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:15:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Matt Dillon Cc: Robert Watson , Kirk McKusick , Julian Elischer , Rik van Riel , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Xu Subject: Re: vm balance In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:02:04 PDT." <200104181702.f3IH24s23282@earth.backplane.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:15:27 +0200 Message-ID: <40677.987614127@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200104181702.f3IH24s23282@earth.backplane.com>, Matt Dillon writes: > If this will get rid of or clean up the specfs garbage, then I'm all > for it. I would love to see a 'clean' fileops based device interface. specfs, aliased vnodes, you name it... I think the aliased vnodes is the single most strong argument of them all for doing this... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message