From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 24 23:50:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA27904 for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 23:50:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA27897 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 23:50:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA29831; Wed, 24 Dec 1997 23:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd029829; Wed Dec 24 23:47:47 1997 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 23:44:54 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer Reply-To: Julian Elischer To: David Greenman cc: Gary Palmer , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: crash (in networking code?) In-Reply-To: <199712250709.XAA16844@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The problem might be fixed with the attached diff. I have also committed > this in rev 1.37 of in_pcb.c. > > -DG Is the aim of this change, to move the MALLOC out of the splnet() region? I would have thought this was safe. What is the failure mode? (I am not saying it's not a problem, just that I don't understand it..) julian