From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 1 12:15:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA01828 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA01814 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ponds.dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA27503; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 15:15:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA22261; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 13:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id MAA12565; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:53:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 12:53:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199710011653.MAA12565@lakes.dignus.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: r-cmds and DNS and /etc/host.conf Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J"org wrote: > > As Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Of course, you should feel free to suggest to us any soloution which > > does not require us to run named to implement. And not feel free to > > suggest running named. > > It doesn't require named to run. I have reconstructed your setup, and > proven that my named doesn't get any request if the setup is done > correctly. As i've mentioned, the only pitfall was specifying > localhost without adding the local domain, and with 127.1 instead of > 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts. Umm... I have 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts and continue to experience the problem... - Dave R. -