From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 27 18:59:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from imo-r03.mx.aol.com (imo-r03.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B59937B404 for ; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from TD790@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.26.) id 6.55.219439e9 (3976); Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:59:19 -0500 (EST) From: TD790@aol.com Message-ID: <55.219439e9.29861892@aol.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:59:30 EST Subject: Re: 64-bit PCI mobos To: mav@wastegate.net, burnscharlesn@hotmail.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In a message dated 1/27/02 6:17:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, mav@wastegate.net writes: > > > >apologies if they are warranted, but your implication that it might be > >acceptable for a MB to spontaneosly reboot with a 180W P/S that is spec'd > at > >less than 150 was so ridiculous that It needed to be quashed. > > > >Anyway, eat the poison berries if you'd like. Those that care have the > info > >they need. > > if it produces under it's rated ammount, if it is lower than the > motherboard requires, all kinds of funky shit can happen. > Ah, but since 180W is clearly above 150, it not clear exactly what your point is? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message