From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 20 17:37:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from w2xo.pgh.pa.us (18.gibs5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.184.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F46137B43C for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:37:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us) Received: from shazam (shazam [192.168.5.3]) by w2xo.pgh.pa.us (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f3L0Zcq08130; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 00:35:38 GMT (envelope-from durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:41:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Durham X-Sender: durham@shazam.int To: Brent Cc: Caleb Walker , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gre-tunneling help In-Reply-To: <002c01c0c996$710b0980$3ab4a8c0@kronos> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Brent wrote: > OK..heres the whole deal... > I work for an ISP ...there are 2 offices ..both in different states....I > have a 70 node internel microsoft network that has a freebsd 4.1 box doing > NAT ..the other office has a PIC router at thier end...we want to > "GRE_TUNNEL" between the 2 locations over the internet. > Ive compiled the BSD box w/ NETGRAPH, IPTUNNEL , NETGRAPH_PPTPGRE .. > > will this be going over "TUNx" ?? in the howto i have ..it says to make > sure the kernel has "TUN" support....i go to /dev and tun0, tun1, tun2 > ...are alll there...althpought when i do "ifconfig -a " TUN isnt there... > im assuming i need tun ?? > anyway ...if anyone can point me in the correct direction...to a good HOWTO > or something.. > > TIA ..all help is way appreciated :-) > I have a different GRE requirement, as we have about 50 people on the road with laptops, but I'm doing GRE on 4.1. I am using mpd from the ports. It uses the netgraph interface and works very well connecting the GRE VPN stuff in Win95/98/2000 to our 4.1 server. I would imagine it will work with your router. The documentation is a little spotty, but the port maintainer gave me some good help, as I will if you want to pursue this. The netgraph device is more efficient than the tun device, as it is more closely coupled to kernel networking. You don't need to put netgraph in the kernel. It is loaded on demand as a kernel module. -Jim Durham > Brent > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Caleb Walker > To: Brent ; > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 12:32 AM > Subject: Re: gre-tunneling help > > > What are you trying to do? Are you trying to allowVPN through your network? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brent" > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:34 PM > Subject: gre-tunneling help > > > > Im using a 4.1 FreeBSD box w/ NAT ..i need to gre-tunneling to work .the > > howto im reading says there has to be at least 1 "tun" interface in the > > down state....when i do a "ifconfig -a " tun isnt in there ...how do i > > get the tun interface to be in "ifconfig" ? > > ..when i look in > > /dev > > > > tun0 tun1 tun2 all are in there... > > > > so i dont think i have to do ./MAKEDEV.. > > how do i get it to show w/ ifconfig ?? did i miss something ?? > > TIA ........any help is really appreciated > > Brent > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message