From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 22 03:06:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40A416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCB443D39
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:51 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from mike@pcmedx.com)
Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([69.167.182.91]) by mta11.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP
          id <20040422100650.YLWZ21898.mta11.adelphia.net@duron.pcmedx.com>;
          Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:06:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 573D4AAE0; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (duron.pcmedx.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 20982-03; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike (mike.pcmedx.com [192.168.240.244])
	by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 76886A927; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <001201c42851$88fb9e70$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
From: "Mike Maltese" <mike@pcmedx.com>
To: "FreeBSD STABLE list" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:06:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd (http://www.amavis.org) and f-prot
	(http://www.f-prot.com) at pcmedx.com
cc: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>
Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:06:52 -0000

> Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
>
> Is this release considered stable?  It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD
> page.  Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead?

Yes, 4.10-BETA == 4-STABLE.