From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 00:28:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D454F37B401 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E0C43F3F for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:28:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h557SeuD071908; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:28:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h557SeNe071907; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:28:40 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h557N7Hh011684; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:23:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306050723.h557N7Hh011684@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:14:09 MDT." <20030604.171409.32720803.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:23:06 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 07:28:45 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > : Err... what do you expect the people in countries that don't allow them > : to have crypto to use? ssh? > > If there are still countries where exporting crypto in a binary-only > product is illegal, then we'd need to make it possible to build the > non-crypto enabled telnet. The non-crypto binary telnet is unchanged by this proposed change. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH