From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 13:31:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54CF16A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:31:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4AD43D41 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:31:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5221F2001453 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:31:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 35D0B200144D for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:31:00 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050225133100220.35D0B200144D@mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:30:59 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <210726534.20050225143059@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050225132841.277ebcf2.albi@scii.nl> References: <01e1222e480475fc993965b9ec8ffbaf@shire.net> <1907334115.20050225132200@wanadoo.fr> <20050225132841.277ebcf2.albi@scii.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:31:02 -0000 albi@scii.nl writes: > it's this short-term thinking which will be fatal for this planet after > all I'll agree that it's not very intelligent thinking for the long term, but that's the way most businesses reason these days. They think only about the next fiscal quarter, and never beyond. > is it so hard to think about the future, and not be dependent on a > ruthless monopoly like Microsoft, not be dependent on a fossile fuel > like oil etc. ? Actually it is. It takes more intelligence to see and evaluate long-term consequences than it does to deal with immediate, short-term consequences. And intelligence is in short supply in today's corporate world. -- Anthony