Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:25:30 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: on the usefulness of vendor's self tests Message-ID: <1122611130.93447.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200507282201.27759.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200507282201.27759.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-KhLt1Ft8N6kKIY+fP49d Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:01 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Whatever you decide to do, be sure to add my patch attached to: >=20 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D302585 >=20 > The last hunk in it was missing in the version of patch-crlgen.c, that I = sent=20 > to the list earlier. This hunk fixes the problem on all architectures (ev= en=20 > if the tests were failing on amd64 only). How does the last hunk in this patch fix a memory corruption problem on amd64? The last hunk is: @@ -1078,5 +1078,5 @@ PORT_SetError(SEC_ERROR_INVALID_ARGS); crlgen_PrintError(crlGenData->parsedLineNum, - "insufficient number of arguments.\n"); + "AddCert(%s, %s) insufficient number of argument= s.\n", certId, revocationDate); return SECFailure; } Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-KhLt1Ft8N6kKIY+fP49d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6a+6b2iPiv4Uz4cRAmosAJ0fE5Mzjo1UKNrT8rAy9Iw9YYVgvQCfViuI 3bvkgqlvg4RATpjln3ai/GA= =BGU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KhLt1Ft8N6kKIY+fP49d--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1122611130.93447.0.camel>