Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 18:14:28 +0200 From: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> Cc: Zhihui Zhang <zzhang@cs.binghamton.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The choice of MAXPHYS Message-ID: <19990603181428.A23846@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> In-Reply-To: <199906031605.KAA93292@panzer.plutotech.com>; from Kenneth D. Merry on Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:05:46AM -0600 References: <19990603172907.A20792@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <199906031605.KAA93292@panzer.plutotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:05:46AM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> I think the 64K value may have been chosen because cards like the Adaptec
> 1542 can't handle more than that.
That's exactly the card I was thinking about (I used to own one). So I was
close :)
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/ _/ _/
Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990603181428.A23846>