From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 21 12:50:36 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D6EB93;
 Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:50:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com)
Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B493EA;
 Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,884,1355097600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="2759555"
Received: from lonpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.30.203.162])
 by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 21 Mar 2013 12:50:34 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.30] (10.30.249.104) by LONPMAILMX01.citrite.net
 (10.30.203.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.298.1; Thu, 21 Mar 2013
 12:50:34 +0000
Message-ID: <514B0219.3040704@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:50:33 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Difference in event channel implementation for Xen PV vs HVM
 guests
References: <51470A2B.5040609@citrix.com>
 <9AE68E59-739C-499C-9991-0C84D4584981@freebsd.org>
 <514B0073.4070406@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <514B0073.4070406@citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports."
 <freebsd-virtualization.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-virtualization-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:50:36 -0000

On 21/03/13 13:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>  > Hi Roger,
>>
>> I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel
>> interface.  In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a
>> general cleanup of the HVM event channel interface.  I haven't merged
>> it back yet because I know the changes break PV and I haven't found
>> time to clean up the PV code, merge the HVM and PV event channel
>> systems, and move IPI/MSI delivery to event channels.
>>
>> I've uploaded Spectra's changes here:
>>
>> 	http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_ev/
> 
> Hi Justin,
> 
> There's at least one file which seems to be missing:

Ops, there at least two files missing:

sys/x86/xen/hvm.c
sys/xen/evtchn/evtchnvar.h