Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:54:51 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> To: "Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc." <tscrum@aaawebsolution.com> Cc: 'FreeBSD Question' <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portaudit question Message-ID: <41BA617B.8080406@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <005601c4dec3$3db30d30$0200a8c0@wolf> References: <005601c4dec3$3db30d30$0200a8c0@wolf>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc. wrote: >Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit would like to see >done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide >examples of what I might due to have it stop complaining. I can find no >examples googling the portaudit "note" below. > > > <snip some very helpful stuff, thanks Thomas!> ># Here's what I did next. > >man portaudit > no help >pkg_delete cvsup-without-gui-16.1h >cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui >make install clean >/usr/local/sbin/portaudit -Fda > and get same output as above. > >Best, > >Thomas S. Crum > > You've gotten some good answers. Please note that cvs(1), which is in the "base system", is not the same thing as cvsup(1), which is a port/package. They pretty much *do* the same thing (well, a _similar_ thing), but they aren't the same, so de/reinstalling cvsup-without-gui wouldn't make any difference; it's not where the problem was anyway :-) Portaudit seems like it will be/is a great tool; I would also recommend subscribing to the security-advisories list --- it's not like it's high volume, <heh!*> , but you'd have seen this info (re: CVS multiple vulnerability Advisory) almost 3 months ago.... Kevin Kinsey *Just thinking, if M$ had such a list, would the backbone "drown"? >:-s\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41BA617B.8080406>