From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon May 9 21:57:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A4BB358D8 for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 21:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9901EE2 for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 21:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x235.google.com with SMTP id s8so103561178ign.0 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:57:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5L3bXoH+xF7QZb2CKSzm1V4TFN+K88UHeDtsvzc5jq4=; b=0eJjIoN3BEcy77yYiSKqcpnAjXK1mc4eH7MUHB5s1WSAYN0hb4/R4Shk1M3/6tl82S v1p+Of+k1lCLBn8Wyfzov2zmQI256TYEGdSKfUjGm3jhvPf9SbcjdCcFLPI3MWQmrgn+ g4bm+iDpSEuU6YzLRve+F3wFVMTXchLhuDIx0YiVVA7oO9KEL8M3tDPtAvH6Luo45veN 0ROF+H9ZoRBVneSAUCpLlNyJUmtEDaDQtuBqNCQB4hYjH3jTnThU8qb+I+wRZRvPuQSO xz3Hy93wMeQk3ARA/07kO6bksnLNu/9yvxJu1vIFy/lmMpSPvoRv7VK+i3sebcTt5lRm GXOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=5L3bXoH+xF7QZb2CKSzm1V4TFN+K88UHeDtsvzc5jq4=; b=a0MgBp+lhsYAL7FMY5/G6A48j2tJ/XoFVnj+TY5WTkuumhm2tf77i4GdyFVGdU8aCX gPfPY/Le+eveQKh37c8/5pL3KTFjwIa4La98uC55ScCRqJIZnGhwx5rVutOdWOgSyzGk WNCL0E7RriRr37/A8nyRNRKF3dtELLOJ8E0YXrj59oP8QdzZlOdTEBzHeJeHnF+4uKuS zMx7dHdmUhSPW6rAg2EcSYvjerRx4eDpk+dkyrAXc7AAe0n53gZW3WzyBvZsVaRZQgAy qgMbf+YTcK1fWFCffels6s+WbkZiYdWiyu7B5937u1IFKaei5DUi+okIE9zoHP73snCv ib1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVG6BKOwhKe1ev0Wnb+ztSmCqVYPCXuPizvEhMRdflRnhwNpWPLBzjhE8OuzypUVATqk7mCWnn8Str7Og== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.34.130 with SMTP id z2mr12861504igi.82.1462831027745; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.89.101 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2016 14:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 14:57:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: TCP problems From: Dieter BSD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 21:57:08 -0000 Larry: > Can you do a sysctl dump for each NIC to see their settings? # sysctl -a | grep re0 dev.miibus.0.%parent: re0 dev.amdtemp.0.core0.sensor0: 16.2C # sysctl -a | grep ue0 # Hmmmm, 16.2 degrees C = 61.16 degrees F Seems very unlikely. Somehow I don't think this is what you had in mind? ifconfig says: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=82098 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80009 media: Ethernet 100baseTX > Keep in mind, if you are going through a switch, you may need to bump > the switch's MTU too if you want to try jumbo frames. Are these machines > direct connected? G_re0 ----- Netgear GS116 --- Netgear GS108 --- T_bge0 --- A_tlp0 NetBSD/alpha tulip 10 Mbps G_ue0 ----- Netgear GS108 --- T_nfe0 http://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/datasheet/en/GS116v2.pdf doesn't seem to be sure about the MTU: page 1 says 9 KB page 2 says 16 KB But ifconfig refuses to increase MTU for ue0, so...