From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec 17 08:24:07 1996
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA03672
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA03661
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA17620; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:24:00 -0800 (PST)
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Plan for integrating Secure RPC -- comments wanted 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Dec 1996 10:28:25 EST."
             <9612171528.AA02135@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:24:00 -0800
Message-ID: <17616.850839840@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Better to just fix the LKM mechanism to not need it...  There are ways
> to do this, but they are all sort of unappealing.

Yeah, I've heard the "move ld into the kernel" arguments too.

That's why I was suggesting this as an interim work-around solution.

					Jordan