From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 18 12:33:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA29180 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:33:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA29175 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA19084; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma019080; Thu Jun 18 12:32:36 1998 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id MAA13453; Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199806181932.MAA13453@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: ipfw - tee option In-Reply-To: from Genossar Chen at "Jun 18, 98 03:13:26 pm" To: chen@csd.cs.technion.ac.il (Genossar Chen) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Genossar Chen writes: > Does anybody know if the "tee" action in the > ipfw command works under 2.2.6 ? > > If not, do u know if the 3.0 support this action ? > Maybe u can recomand me on different way to do the > same as "tee" action (beside regular divert socket). It's not implemented in either 2.2.6 or 3.0-current yet. Right now, using "divert" instead and writing the packet back is the workaround. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message