From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 18 23:57:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4781065688 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outY.internet-mail-service.net (outy.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFD38FC0C for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A4E24DB; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628392D6004; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48D2EAEC.1020902@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:57:32 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <3170f42f0809010507q6c37a9d5q19649bc261d7656d@mail.gmail.com> <48BBE7B2.4050409@FreeBSD.org> <48BCE4AA.6050807@elischer.org> <3170f42f0809020017k643180efte155a5b5701a40cf@mail.gmail.com> <3170f42f0809180101w57e1d4c1m1bfcef00200e6b52@mail.gmail.com> <48D2CF66.8080608@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48D2CF66.8080608@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: debarshi.ray@gmail.com, Robert Watson , FreeBSD networking and TCP/IP list Subject: Re: reading routing table X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:57:33 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Debarshi Ray wrote: >> ... >> By the way, would you want someone to implement 'show' support for >> FreeBSD's route implementation? I can give it a go now. :-) >> > > For sure, we'd be very happy to see a patch like that. > > Many thanks > BMS and don't forget the same patch for netsta\t so that it doesn't need /dev/kmem for netstat -r :-) BUT, don't forget about multiple routing tables..