From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Feb 25 18:32:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7AF5137B401; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from steve@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1Q2WJc62221;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2001 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from steve)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
From: <steve@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200102260232.f1Q2WJc62221@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: steve@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/24983: Emacs ports have misleading names
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Emacs ports have misleading names

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->asami
Responsible-Changed-By: steve
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Feb 25 18:29:55 PST 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I agree that it is misleading at best to have emacs instead of emacs19.  I
don't however think we should move emacs20 to emacs.  See the tcl, tk, qt, ...
ports for other examples where we use the version in the port name when we
have multiple version of a program in the Ports Tree.  If Asami-san will do
the repo-copy, then I'll fix things up afterwards.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24983

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message