Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:09:06 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwarz <freebsd.asc@strcmp.org> To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org, ian@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PINE64 - 12.0-CURRENT r324563 - ntpd can't keep time Message-ID: <4aff62bc14e.1f031cb6@mail.schwarzes.net> In-Reply-To: <4AB259A5-F00A-408F-968A-26AD8D776708@dsl-only.net> References: <d85f883f-84c2-5051-1996-2a0e73a2c1e7@restart.be> <4BF75B1E-318C-414A-B5D4-4BA7D6578316@dsl-only.net> <1509029871.56824.49.camel@freebsd.org> <c2bff518-89ce-4956-2548-e56afab5d83d@restart.be> <4af740148ca.47a474e3@mail.schwarzes.net> <04b67007-a95a-9e40-28b4-764adf8b2ded@restart.be> <FCA144E8-121A-48A5-8CDB-101FBDE6E84C@dsl-only.net> <dceb4702-8ede-aadd-17d8-ed41436955ad@restart.be> <4aff37249b6.70779c93@mail.schwarzes.net> <4AB259A5-F00A-408F-968A-26AD8D776708@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14.11.17, Mark Millard wrote: Hi Mark, > I'm not the one with the clock problem > but I'll note that the -r325700 Pine64+ > 2GB with a production-style kernel (not > debug) that I'm using has rather different > dev.cpu.0 output from sysctl as far as > "freq" goes (no such): My pine is the same, a PINE A64+ 2GB version. Using also a "non-debug" kernel config root@pinelot:~ $ cat /sys/arm64/conf/PINE64-ASC include "GENERIC" ident PINE64-ASC # remove predefined options from "GENERIC" nomakeoptions DEBUG nomakeoptions WITH_CTF nooptions KDB, KDB_TRACE, DDB nooptions INVARIANTS, INVARIANT_SUPPORT nooptions WITNESS, WITNESS_SKIPSPIN nooptions USB_DEBUG nooptions BUF_TRACKING nooptions DEADLKRES nooptions FULL_BUF_TRACKING # add options we want options TMPFS # Efficient memory filesystem > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD pine64 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r325700M arm64 aarch64 1200053 1200053 modified? > # sysctl dev.cpu.0 > dev.cpu.0.%parent: cpulist0 > dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: name=cpu@0 compat=arm,cortex-a53 > dev.cpu.0.%location: > dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu > dev.cpu.0.%desc: Open Firmware CPU > > Looking, /usr/ports -r447122 moved > sysutils/u-boot-pine64 over to be > us-boot-master based back on 2017-Aug-2. > May be we have differing: > > u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin > > vintages dd'd to seek=8 on the > sdcards? Some other difference > someplace else? Latest u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin was not working for me, I'm using an older one. Maybe a dtb processing problem, mine is up to date (created from the dts). -asc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4aff62bc14e.1f031cb6>