From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 15 19:10:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B8B16A4FD for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from com1.ht-systems.ru (com1.ht-systems.ru [83.97.104.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903AD43D60 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from [217.118.83.1] (helo=fonon.realnet) by com1.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD4J7-0006De-FO; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:10:36 +0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fonon.realnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE1011F38; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:10:08 +0600 (YEKST) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:10:02 +0600 From: Stanislav Sedov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, B Briggs Message-ID: <20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost> In-Reply-To: <44E218A7.8020505@bellsouth.net> References: <44E218A7.8020505@bellsouth.net> Organization: MBSD labs, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Spam-Flag: SKIP X-Spam-Yversion: Spamooborona 1.6.0 Cc: Subject: Re: devel/fam build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:10:58 -0000 --Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:55:35 -0500 B Briggs mentioned:r > Anyway, I have a question: Why are there two ports here that do the same= =20 > thing? Some of my ports specify fam, some specify gamin, and of course I= =20 > have to have the WITH_FAM_SYSTEM var in make.conf to remove conflicts.=20 > If the two DON'T do the same thing, what is the difference? Just asking. >=20 They are merely two different implementations of FAM subsystem: one from SGI, another from RedHat. I belive, that SGI's one is sligthly faster currently. Also, it covers standard completely contradictory to gamin. If you have the same problem, can you please provide a list of installed packages and error log? I tested it on 4.x and 7.x with all ports up-to-date and there is no such problem. --=20 Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. =F2=CF=D3=D3=C9=D1, =ED=CF=D3=CB=D7=C1 http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 --Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE4f/vK/VZk+smlYERAu6xAJ9VzeItNT9IbbaI2/HDHN33TIJCJQCff1wE 5mDTMQ3rDLsq4X0zNfIFbnI= =gsIr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_WbNhFI1NVPDTKUJcczy/9wv--