From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jan 9 10:50:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D3937B698 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f09Io4V14069; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:50:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101091850.f09Io4V14069@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Cc: From: Kees Jan Koster Subject: Re: alpha/24177: Patch for fxp on Alpha Reply-To: Kees Jan Koster Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR alpha/24177; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kees Jan Koster To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: alpha/24177: Patch for fxp on Alpha Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 19:46:26 +0100 > > You don't say which specific platform this is. It's unusual that I/O space > works better than Memory space. It's also true that various flavors of EEPRO > are known to work. > D'oh! I keep forgetting Alpha's aren't PC's. :) Here's the relevant dmesg snippet. DEC AXPpci Alpha PC AXPpci33, 166MHz 8192 byte page size, 1 processor. CPU: LCA Family major=4 minor=2 OSF PAL rev: 0x100090002012d I apologize for not including this information immediately. > > I sure wish I knew whether the maintainer for this card s active or not on > this. I think your patches are in the right direction, but aren't really quite > what we should be looking for- they could be a lot tighter and should be > runtime as opposed to compile time settable- see isp_pci.c for an example (not > the best, granted) of this. > These are not my own patches. I reported this problem earlier on freebsd-alpha and in the resulting discussion these patches came up. I tried them and they worked for me. The discussion was in the "fxp0 hangs on a PC164 using STABLE" and the "fxp0 hangs my AXPpci33" threads, on freebsd-alpha around July 2000. At the time they were not committed because of their hackish nature, as you have noted yourself. Someone hinted that he was going to rework them in a more socially acceptable manner, but his time seems to have been claimed by more important matters. Since this was months ago I figured that I should try to get the patch committed. Yours, Kees Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------ Kees Jan Koster e-mail: dutchman "at" tccn.cs.kun.nl www: http://www.kjkoster.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ You're only young once, but you can stay immature all your life. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message