From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 19:29:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C4A10656D0; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe12.swip.net [212.247.155.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F828FC19; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Ma5krZdYoiIA:10 a=-DXRHlJb_54A:10 a=MXw7gxVQKqGXY79tIT8aFQ==:17 a=s3CS8VpXvsVOQ2LcikAA:9 a=69vwkcdzZ3Z5PCmGLONK-KCMxvcA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from [62.113.132.61] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop) by mailfe12.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 1032443675; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:29:07 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: "M. Warner Losh" Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:31:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200903041001.37376.hselasky@c2i.net> <200903041910.58446.hselasky@c2i.net> <20090304.114244.106970172.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090304.114244.106970172.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903042031.37578.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low perfomance when read from usb flash drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:29:14 -0000 On Wednesday 04 March 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > > : > If you do change to filters then this is much easier with taskqueues as > : > it has a fast variant, otherwise you would need an intermediate step in > : > order to signal the existing usb threading scheme. The taskqueue > : > changeover will be happening soonish anyway. > : > : I am not going to do anything with filters. I'm going to try some other > : things. > > Then you will always have the scheduling delay... But the scheduling delay is not in the millisecond range on a 2.4GHz ?? --HPS