From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 05:52:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8384016A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:52:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A61043D1F for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:52:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5K5qUSI001115; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:52:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j5K5qU6N001112; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:52:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17078.22937.726253.34028@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:52:25 -0700 To: Alex Zbyslaw In-Reply-To: <42B556CE.6020103@dial.pipex.com> References: <20050619074720.V11229@www.pukruppa.net> <42B556CE.6020103@dial.pipex.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca Cc: "P.U.Kruppa" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Yet another RAID Question (YARQ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:52:40 -0000 >>>>> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:28:14 +0100, >>>>> Alex Zbyslaw said: > A word of caution, though. A Linux system (which I help administer) had > two SCSI disks mounted as RAID-1 through some kind of Adaptec > controller. Recently the machine crashed and it transpires that one of > the disks hadn't been written to since 2002! I am told that the bootup > screen showed the RAID-1 as working, and Linux could *only* see one > virtual disk -- the supposed RAID mirror. So, I think your question is > a very good one! We had (apparently) no way of knowing what was going > on. The machine crashed with no messages whatsoever, after losing all > access to its disks, and there was no indication that RAID-1 was not > functioning. In order to boost read performance, a RAID card should interleave reading from a RAID-1 volume by reading alternately from one drive and then the other. You can see this in alternate blinking of the activity lights of the drives. If you are not seeing this when copying a large file, then this would suggest that a RAID-1 volume is not working as it should. Sandy