From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 1 10:33:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA04636 for current-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA04631 for ; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA04301; Thu, 1 May 1997 10:31:49 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199705011731.KAA04301@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Top no system utility ? (was Re: Longer user names: take 2 ) To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 10:31:49 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <19970501115238.57246@klemm.gtn.com> from "Andreas Klemm" at May 1, 97 11:52:38 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Same for top would be great ! > > > > Sorry, that's a port, not a system utility, isn't it? > > revision 1.1.1.1 > date: 1997/03/23 18:55:20; author: joerg; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0 > > ;-) % which ls /bin/ls % which ps /bin/ps % which top top: Command not found. What I meant is that top is under active maintenance by a third party, so any patches need to go through there instead of through FreeBSD. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.